We appreciate your interest in our programming Lessons Learned from Law School: A Welcome to the Tufts Lawyers Association (TLA) Law Student Group Circuit. Whether you missed it or want to watch it again, I am happy to share with you the recording of the event.
Please be sure to join us at our upcoming event:
Law Day on the Hill - Balancing the Scales of Justice in Criminal Law
March 10, 6-7:30 PM ET (Zoom meeting)
The evening begins with initial introductions and a panel discussion focusing on current issues in criminal law and procedure. The panel features former federal and state prosecutors, a current MA Appeals Court judge and a law professor. The discussion will include panelists sharing their experiences and insights on policy and practical issues related to criminal law. The evening wraps up with plenty of time for Q&A and for all to speak in breakout rooms in more detail about their careers, law school, and other applicable topics.
Also, regardless if you are a student or an alumni, if you are interested in contacting the Tufts Pre-Law Advisor, her info is Dovie.King@tufts.edu
If you have any questions about Tufts Lawyers Association or want to get more involved please contact Steve Feldman, TLA President, at steven.feldman@mmlawus.com
Thank you and we hope to see you on March 10!
Who Can Be Charged For Contempt Of Court?
ReplyDeleteThere are a variety of situations that can lead to contempt of court charges. san diego criminal lawyers It’s important to note, a minor can also be charged with being in contempt of court by violating a lawful court order. If this happens to be the situation you are in, contacting a criminal defense lawyer should be a priority. Here are some examples that illustrate who can be charged with PC 166.
Example 1:
Devon has a restraining order in place against her ex-husband, Tracy. It was issued due to multiple domestic violence charges. best criminal lawyer in san diego The restraining order stipulated he could not come within five-hundred feet of her, her home, or her workplace. Tracy got drunk, drove to Devon’s workplace, and made a scene. He smashed her car window and yelled hateful epithets at her. Not only is Tracy guilty of being in contempt of court for violating the restraining order, but he would also be financially liable for the damage he caused to Devon’s vehicle. In cases like this, if Devon’s employment was negatively impacted as a result of Tracy’s behavior, she would also be within her rights to sue for punitive damages, such as any loss of wages.
Example 2:
affordable criminal defense attorney san diego Sarah, a witness, began acting obnoxious and belligerent when she was being cross-examined in court. Angry that her testimony was being questioned, she began ignoring the material questions and posting questions of her own. The judge gave her several verbal warnings before deeming her in contempt of court. In this case, Sarah was not a criminal who was under trial. However, she did agree to be a witness and respect the authority of the court of justice as well as the judge, prosecution, and legal defense teams involved. Her disrespectful and combative behavior while on the witness stand do rise to the status of being in contempt.
Example 3:
Valerie was a witness to a violent attack and was scared to get involved at all. Nevertheless, she had been the person who called the cops and got the perpetrator arrested. She agreed to testify in a criminal trial. Unfortunately, she got cold feet when the time came to sit on the witness stand. She refused to be sworn in as a witness during the criminal trial. Although Valerie got nervous, she was still obligated to testify after having made legal statements and agreeing to appear on the witness stand. Her refusal to being sworn in as a witness during this criminal trial is enough to rise to the level of contempt of court under PC 166.
Example 4:
A judge orders witnesses to corporate fraud, Rhea and Frank, to stay away from each other until the criminal trial is concluded. This court order was issued to prevent any witness tampering and/or conflict of interest, which included talking about the on-going trial with one another. Frank was romantically interested in Rhea and decided to ask her out anyway. She agreed and they went out to lunch together. Unfortunately, they revealed details about the trial and were overheard by several people, including a journalist. Their conversation also involved conjecture about the case, assumptions that were voiced without supportive evidence to back it. Simple actions like this can result in contempt of court charges under PC 166. Especially when the judge specifically outlined the terms of the court order and they had initially agreed to follow them. Rhea and Frank violated the court orders for failing to stay away from each other and for talking about the trial in a public place where their discussion was easily overheard.
Thank you for every other fantastic article. Where else may anyone get that kind of information in such a perfect approach of writing?
ReplyDeleteHennessy Dows Lawyers